Skip to content
A global directory of newspapers, TV, radio, magazines and news mediaDiscover a different perspective
WorldNMWorld News Media Directory

WORLD NEWS MEDIA DIRECTORY

Ankyun+3

Explore this media outlet and visit its official website.

About Ankyun+3

Ankyun+3

Ankyun+3 was a local television station based in Alaverdi, a town in Armenia's northern Lori region. Its editor-in-chief was Hrachya Papinyan. The station is documented in the international press-freedom record chiefly because of what happened to it in May 2003, when its broadcasts were suspended days before an election in circumstances that Reporters Without Borders and IFEX reported as politically motivated. It appears again in the record as a contributor to research on freedom of information in Armenia's regions, as a participant in joint regional television projects in 2007 and 2008, and as one of the regional channels that protested in 2013 against exclusion from Armenia's digital broadcasting multiplexes. Those episodes, set in their context, form the verifiable history of Ankyun+3 that this profile records. Where sources are silent — on the station's founding date, schedule or final years — this profile says so rather than filling the gaps.

Alaverdi and local television in Lori region

Alaverdi is a town in the Debed river valley in Lori, Armenia's northern region bordering Georgia, historically associated with copper mining and metallurgy. Lori was, by Armenian standards, rich in local broadcasting: the regional capital Vanadzor alone had four television channels until 2016, and smaller towns such as Alaverdi sustained stations of their own. A town station like Ankyun+3 served a purpose that neither Yerevan-based national channels nor even Vanadzor's regional broadcasters could fully meet. Its journalists lived in the community they covered, reported on the town's schools, factories, council and roads, and gave local officials and residents a screen on which their own town appeared. Research on freedom of information in Armenia's regions, to which Ankyun+3 contributed reporting, also shows the other side of that closeness: regional journalists described how officials responded differently to local media than to national media, and how access to information from regional organisations could be restricted by secrecy and by hierarchies that reserved information for higher bodies. Ankyun+3 worked daily inside exactly those conditions.

Leadership under Hrachya Papinyan

The documented record names Hrachya Papinyan as the editor-in-chief of Ankyun+3. It is Papinyan who speaks for the station in the key source on its history, the May 2003 suspension, explaining the station's position to international monitors. The Freedom of Information Center of Armenia's bulletin on regional practice carries a contribution from Karine Simonyan of the Ankyun+3 TV company in Alaverdi, which indicates that the station's journalists also took part in professional discussion of how regional media obtain information from state structures. Beyond these named references, no verified source consulted for this profile provides a founding year for the station, a list of its staff, its ownership structure, its frequency or its broadcast hours. Armenian regional stations of this period were typically small private companies with a handful of journalists and camera operators, but the specifics of Ankyun+3's operation beyond the episodes documented below cannot be reconstructed from reliable sources, and this profile does not attempt to do so.

The suspension of May 2003

On 20 May 2003, the local office of Armenia's Telecommunications Centre suspended the broadcasts of Ankyun+3. The official explanation, as reported by IFEX and Reporters Without Borders, was that the station had failed to respect technical regulations and had not broadcast state programmes. The timing made the decision immediately controversial: the suspension came five days before an election, during the parliamentary election campaign. Papinyan stated that the forced closure was politically motivated, because the station had not supported Hovhannes Kochinyan, a candidate who was the brother of the regional governor. A week before the suspension, tax inspectors had also initiated an examination of the station's financial records, a sequence that the station and press-freedom organisations read as coordinated pressure. Reporters Without Borders placed the episode in a wider pattern, noting many cases of obstruction of news coverage during the two rounds of the presidential election of 19 February and 5 March 2003, and the International Press Institute's World Press Freedom Review for 2003 likewise recorded that pressure had been applied to Ankyun+3 TV in Alaverdi during the parliamentary election campaign. The suspension thus became one of the cited examples in international reporting on the vulnerability of Armenian regional broadcasters at election time.

Why the 2003 episode mattered

The Ankyun+3 case mattered beyond Alaverdi because it showed how administrative and technical instruments could silence a small broadcaster without any formal censorship order. A suspension justified on technical grounds, a tax inspection opened days earlier, and an election days later: each element alone might have an innocent explanation, but together they formed the pattern that Armenian and international press-freedom monitors documented repeatedly in that era. The IPI review of the same year observed that there was no direct censorship in Armenia, yet popular independent channels were kept off the air, and that many journalists associated elections with press-freedom violations. For a town station, even a temporary suspension during a campaign had a double effect: it removed one local source of election information at the moment voters most needed it, and it signalled to every other small broadcaster in the region what non-support for a powerful candidate could cost. That is why a brief suspension of a small station in a northern mining town entered the permanent international record, preserved by IFEX alerts and press-freedom reviews long after the broadcasts themselves were over.

Everyday regional journalism and freedom of information

Between the moments of crisis, Ankyun+3 did the ordinary work of a regional station, and traces of that work survive in the Freedom of Information Center of Armenia's material on regional practice. The contribution associated with the station describes the practical obstacles regional journalists faced when asking state structures for information: officials asking whether an interview was for republican or local media, speaking more openly to local outlets yet withholding information on instructions from above, and, in one Alaverdi episode described in the same bulletin, education officials not allowing Ankyun+3 cameramen into a meeting with teachers and parents about the fate of two local schools, at which displeased participants publicly criticised the governor's activities. The station also appears as a working newsroom in other records: a 2010 environmental report on the Alaverdi area notes an interview about the project given to a journalist of the Alaverdi TV channel Ankyun Plus 3 and broadcast in the evening news, and civic organisations recorded the station hosting discussion programmes, including a 2007 talk show on youth and the pre-election process in Lori. Together these fragments show a station embedded in its town's public life well beyond the 2003 suspension.

Cooperation with other regional channels, 2007–2008

Ankyun+3 also appears in the record as a collaborator in Armenia's regional media community. In a Yerevan Press Club project supported by UNDP around the 2008 presidential election, five regional companies — Tsayg of Gyumri, STV1 of Sevan, Sosi of Kapan, Lori of Vanadzor and Ankyun+3 of Alaverdi — each produced a talk show that was also broadcast by all the others, examining how adequately the problems of the regions were raised in the election campaign. Ankyun+3's contribution took as its second subject whether democratic procedures and freedoms, in particular freedom of expression and freedom of assembly, were observed in the regions. The choice of subject is consistent with the station's own history after 2003. The station is also listed among the signatories of the Code of Ethics of Armenian Media and Journalists maintained by the Yerevan Press Club, alongside its Lori neighbours Mig TV and Lori TV, which confirms its standing within the professional community of Armenian broadcasters in that period.

The digital transition and the 2013 protest

The final documented chapter of Ankyun+3's history concerns the digital switchover. Amendments to the broadcasting law in 2010 provided for only one private digital television company per region; in Lori the permit went to Fortuna TV, leaving the region's other stations, Ankyun+3 among them, outside the digital system. In November 2013, six regional outlets — Lori, MIG and Ankyun+3 from Lori, ALT from Armavir region, Ijevan from Tavush and Hrazdan from Kotayk — addressed an open letter to the President, the Speaker of Parliament and the Prime Minister, warning that the cessation of analogue transmission made their work useless because their programmes would not reach consumers, that they had been deprived of advertisers, and that, with no private multiplexer competition held, their companies were more likely to close than to find a digital path. They received no response. Analogue broadcasting in Armenia was switched off from 26 October 2016, and eleven regional companies were left in the position the letter had described. Ankyun+3's signature on that letter is the station's last firmly documented public act in the sources used for this profile.

What is not known about Ankyun+3

The limits of the record should be stated plainly. No verified source consulted gives the year Ankyun+3 was founded, the origin of its distinctive name, its ownership or financing, its audience size, or a confirmed date on which it ceased broadcasting. Its documented history is therefore a series of well-attested episodes — the politically contested suspension of 20 May 2003 under editor-in-chief Hrachya Papinyan, its freedom-of-information reporting, its 2007–2008 cooperation with fellow regional channels, and its 2013 protest against digital exclusion — rather than a continuous corporate history. That pattern is typical for Armenia's smallest broadcasters, whose everyday output was never archived in publicly accessible form. For the WorldNM directory, Ankyun+3 is recorded as a local television station of Alaverdi, Lori region, Armenia, documented from 2003 to 2013, and remembered in press-freedom literature as an early case of election-period pressure on regional media.

Coverage & topics

See the official website for current coverage.

Related media

View all →

&flix

TV Channels

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

English

&flix is a television channel owned by Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited (ZEEL), currently operating as a sports channel after a genre conversion that took effect on April 1,…

→

&Pictures

TV Channels

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

English

Overview &pictures is a Hindi-language satellite movie channel based in Mumbai and owned by Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited (ZEEL). Launched on 18 August 2013, it was the first…

→

&Privé HD

TV Channels

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

English

&Privé HD &Privé HD was a premium English-language movie channel from Zee Entertainment Enterprises, based in Mumbai, that set out to show Indian viewers the other side of…

→

&TV

TV Channels

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

English

&TV is an Indian Hindi-language general entertainment television channel owned and operated by Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited (ZEEL), headquartered in Mumbai, Maharashtra. Launched on 2 March 2015, it…

→

&TV

TV Channels

London, England, United Kingdom

English

&TV &TV, also known as And TV, is a Hindi-language general entertainment channel owned by Zee Entertainment Enterprises (ZEEL). Launched in India on 2 March 2015 and in…

→

About this listing

Where can I read or listen to this outlet?

Use Visit official website. The publisher controls access, subscriptions, schedules and availability.

Does WorldNM endorse this outlet?

No. A listing helps identify a source. It is not an endorsement or a guarantee of its reporting.